Humaney

A protocol for human self-cultivation.

Every human is a prime โ€” one, unrepeatable, indivisible.

What it is

The goal is the human, not the coin.

Before the token, before the score-card, before anything technical, Humaney is an invitation to grow: to steady your heart and mind, to sharpen memory and focus, to follow your curiosity. The token is a deliberate by-product.

It begins with a ceremony on your own phone. You sing, you breathe, your face proves you are live โ€” and your device turns that into a zero-knowledge proof that those values were computed together, by the holder of one secret, with nothing about your body leaving the phone.

On the question every such protocol is judged on โ€” one person wearing many masks โ€” we bound the flow, not the stock. Making identities scarce would take a database of bodies, an appointed verifier, or a price of entry, and this architecture refuses all three on purpose. So we bound what any identity can earn per unit of human-attended time instead: one hunt claim a day — a limit the founder tightened from three specifically so this could not be built into an addictive game, and which the contract now live still sets at three — a long cooldown before a place pays again, every reward pulled rather than pushed, and a map of real places you have to stand in. That daily cap is the hunt’s, not a ceiling over everything you can do in a day: the practice sessions carry their own separate limits, and the periodic leaderboard payouts are not spaced at all on the contract now live — a winning prize is transferred the moment the round is resolved. A per-person daily spacing is written and waiting for the next deploy. A thousand identities are not a thousand incomes โ€” they are a thousand daily chores, for one human with one day.

Nothing derived from your body is transmitted by the protocol, or written on-chain. There is no biometric database โ€” nothing to leak, nothing to seize.

The ceremony, step by step

A brief liveness check. A minute of free breathing. About five minutes of paced coherent breathing. A couple of minutes reading your heart rhythm at your fingertip. Then singing a sequence of phonemes, six rounds, bracketed by a closing liveness check. Fifteen minutes is a fair ask for a human โ€” and the minutes are cultivation, not security: the timer binds only someone using our app, and modified software skips every minute of it. What bounds mass enrolment today is not the invite list: the contract that mints an identity holds no allowlist, so an invitation decides who we guide through the ceremony, not who may enrol. One identity per wallet address is enforced on-chain โ€” and addresses are free, so that part is bookkeeping rather than a barrier. What is not bookkeeping is an admission cap tied to the existing population: it is live on the contract today, and each day it admits a few hundred more identities than already exist โ€” so the population can at most double in a day. That throttles mass enrolment; it does not stop it, and doubling is not slow. A determined effort still arrives, in daylight. Enrolment is open on this testnet deliberately, while HMN is worth nothing: we would rather be attacked here and learn how than trust a gate we never tested. The duplicate-voice comparison that would flag the same person enrolling twice is switched off today. Arming it at a later deploy would add friction for someone using our app honestly; it would not bound how many identities can exist, because modified software can simply submit nothing to compare. And physicality bounds what an identity can earn by standing in a place โ€” not how many identities exist; it is the bound we lean on hardest and the one least built. The minutes are what makes joining worth doing; they are not what makes joining hard.

What reaches the chain, and what it checks

Three values: a commitment (an anonymous stand-in for you), a nullifier, and a public record of the device you enrolled with. Nothing derived from your body, at any point. The nullifier is derived from your voice — it is a hash of the stable key the ceremony extracts, so an honest app reproduces it if you enrol again. What makes it only a replay gate on-chain is that the app hands it to the contract, and the contract cannot tell a real one from a made-up one: it bars an enrolment from registering twice, not a person from enrolling twice. The device record is forensic, not enforcement โ€” captured in public at the one moment it exists, so anyone can check it against Apple's or Google's roots off-chain, later; nothing about it is verified on-chain today. Catching the same person enrolling fresh is a separate voice comparison, and it now runs in the shipping ceremony — armed at the 2026-09-01 deployment. It compares and records; it does not refuse anyone. And the number we have for how well it works is one person’s: across 54 real ceremonies the founder was matched to himself about two times in three. That is a measurement of one man recognising himself, not of how often it recognises you — we have no second person’s figure to give you yet. The white paper's Appendix A publishes the measurements.

Season One

Four qualities

A steady heart enables sustained attention; attention deepens memory; curiosity propels all of it.

Coherence

Steady the heart. Rest a fingertip over the camera and your phone reads the rhythm of your heartbeat; a few minutes of paced breathing measurably moves the score.

Why coherence comes first

You cannot focus, remember or wonder well from a dysregulated body. And in many traditions the heart is the seat of the soul: a coherent human is more able to follow their heart, and to be honest โ€” integrity flows from an unconflicted inner state.

Memory

Hold and connect. A short practice: hold and reproduce a growing sequence. Ancient technique, honest measurement โ€” you either recall it or you don't.

Focus

Direct the mind. Steady attention on abstract symbols โ€” and on your own face transformed: your half-face mirrored into a whole, your halves merged into a person you have never seen.

The gaze practice, read deeper

The two halves of a face can be read as the two halves of a psyche โ€” the conscious and the unconscious, the manifest and the unmanifest. To sit with each, and then with their merge, is to hold both: a glimpse of the integrated self you are growing toward.

Curiosity

Reach outward. Inward, curiosity explores the self. Outward, it walks โ€” a world map of some 1,200 real places, where what counts is that you actually went and stood there.

  • The Humaney coin held against a bright sun
  • The coin on a rock above a snow-covered peak
  • The coin resting on the sea floor among coral
  • The coin in deep green rainforest
  • The coin against a field of stars and nebulae

The mark, out in the world.

The pilgrimage hunt

Sacred sites, world-heritage places, cities. Each season a hidden subset lights up with rewards; which ones is sealed in advance and revealed only after the season ends โ€” mystery while you play, full audit forever after. A spot that pays cannot pay again for 377 days, and one identity may claim at most one hunt reward in a day — that is the flow bound written on a calendar. The founder tightened that from three so this could not be built into an addictive game; the contract now live still allows three. Finish the program and take a Council seat and you earn seven nominations — seven places you personally put on that map. Both conditions are required. (This page said the Council was far smaller than the cohort, so most who finish would not earn them, until 2026-09-03. The seat count is under active change — a ruling that day sets the testnet council to the same size as the cohort — so the sentence understated it. We give no seat figure here rather than replace one moving number with another.) (This page said “complete the program and you earn seven nominations” until 2026-09-02. That stated one half of an and: the grant is refused unless the person has both graduated and been seated.) You choose where; you do not get to name them. Once a place is on the map it stays: a later conviction can stop you nominating more, and cannot remove the ones already there. And the honest asymmetry: physicality is the bound we lean on hardest and the one least built. A phone reports where it says it is; the outside witnesses that would fix that are designed, not shipped. Faking presence is the single most valuable bug you could file.

The fixed frame

A short, hard-to-change core. Unlimited freedom on top.

Four rules the rest is built around โ€” and below, plainly, which parts of them the bytecode itself enforces. Everything else belongs to the community.

What the handover transfers

During Phase 1 the founder holds the upgrade key, and most of the protocol stays changeable on purpose. Eighteen functions are welded at deploy โ€” retirement, the grievance channel, free speech, the permanent action log, and the anti-whale and supply floor. Welding means those eighteen refuse replacement and refuse removal: the chain itself turns the transaction down. And here is the part that sentence leaves out, which matters more than the eighteen. The weld is a flag in ordinary contract storage, and an upgrade can carry initialisation code that runs against that storage — so the weld can be cleared, but not in one step: it takes code written for that purpose plus one upgrade call that runs it, every step a public on-chain artefact. (How many transactions that is depends on whether the code already exists, so this page no longer gives a number.) (This page said “one owner transaction” until 2026-09-02. That was false and it understated our own protection: no upgrade operation on its own unwelds anything — replacement and removal are refused by the contract, and there is no unlock.) The honest promise is not that they cannot be changed. It is that nobody can change them without a visible owner transaction on a public chain — the protection is that you would see it, not that it is impossible. It does not freeze the protocol, because new functions can still be added beside them. The identity module and the joiner arithmetic are deliberately not welded, so the joining rules can still be repaired. Everything unwelded is a promise the protocol intends to keep, not one it is structurally bound to โ€” and that is the honest difference. The upgrade key ends at retirement: it transfers, in one transaction, to the successor address named in advance. Be exact about what that is and is not โ€” there is no timelock on it, or on any other founder power: a diamond cut, an ownership transfer and a solvency mint are each one immediate transaction, with no vote, no delay and no second signature. What bounds the key is the welded eighteen, a public chain, and our diligence โ€” and the third of those is a person, not a mechanism. The veto becomes the Council's, exercised at a golden-ratio supermajority of 0.618 โ€” 233 of 377 seats at full size โ€” and the power of the purse transfers the same way; no chamber may spend alone.

The count is eighteen, and that part is settled. A re-derivation on 2026-09-01 produced twenty and was withdrawn on 2026-09-02: the deploy composes eighteen, and two test suites assert exactly that number, so a passing build is the measurement. This page said the figure should be read as “disputed, not measured” between those two dates. That was wrong, and it was wrong in the direction that costs a reader least — it hedged a number that was already checkable. Two things remain true and are worth more than the count. The eighteen cannot be read back off the chain: no function exposes the welded set, so this figure describes the code we deploy, and you cannot verify it the way you can verify a balance. And which functions make up the eighteen is not separately checked — the five groups named above come from the deploy code and are very likely right, but no test asserts them individually, so any five groups totalling eighteen would satisfy every check we have. The claim this figure sits beside never depended on the number: no upgrade operation on its own can unweld anything, at eighteen or at twenty.

The same honesty applies to your tokens, and this is the largest example of it. Every transfer of HMN between two registered people calls into the upgradeable part of the protocol before it completes, and if that call fails the transfer fails. On the diamond live since 2026-09-01 (0xf6b7eec7…4efe; the 2026-08-06 one this paragraph originally described is tombstoned, and the hook was re-checked on the new chain — recordTrade routes to a facet there), two things would do that: removing the called function in an owner transaction, or a wiring mistake that makes it refuse. So whoever holds the upgrade key can halt HMN transfers, or block particular ones, for as long as they hold it. Be precise about what that is and is not: it can stop tokens moving, and it cannot itself move them. This particular lever is censorship, not confiscation: it cannot spend your balance or reassign it to anyone.

There is one separate path that can take tokens, and it is not this one. A fraud conviction, carried through every appeal, can burn part of a convicted person’s balance. It is bounded in three ways worth knowing: it can never take you below the joining grant your cohort minted, the amount is re-clamped to that limit at the moment it executes, and what is taken is re-minted into the Coherence Commons rather than destroyed or paid to an accuser — the community later decides its use. We mention it here because a page that told you your balance could never be touched would be wrong.

We did not add this in order to have it. It is the price of those protections being enforceable at all: the alternative — letting that call fail silently — would have permanently given up any future ability to enforce the wallet cap or to freeze a single account after a fraud finding. Both choices are permanent, because the token contract cannot be upgraded after launch, and there is no third option. The founder ruled on it in August knowing precisely this. It is held by the founder now and by the High Council after the handover, and like every other power here, using it takes a visible transaction on a public chain — the protection is that you would see it.

Invitation

The first cohort is small, and hand-invited.

A closed testnet, stood up by a few founding stewards โ€” humans stress-testing the ceremony, the four qualities, and the governance that will one day be entirely theirs. We read for good faith and genuine resonance with the mission, not for crypto experience.

If you were invited, you know the way in. There will be a way to apply.